The ICANN meeting in Sydney gave us both a new head for the Internet’s governing body and a more specific roadmap to the introduction of new gTLDs.  Both are good things, but neither is as meaningful as the subtle but measureable shift in attitude among marketing executives.  Long in lock-step with their lawyers opposed to the new Web landscape, they are now beginning to contemplate the brand value to be found to the right of the dot in a domain name address.

Note this from the Financial Times:

“‘We spend a lot of time and money trying to drive people to websites. Anything that makes it easier to find things on the web is a good thing,’  said Tom Eslinger of Saatchi & Saatchi, the advertising agency.”

It began  with the release of the “Liberalisaton of the Internet” report released last month.  It spread as more companies became even aware of the possibility of owning a branded registry of names and is accelerating as it become clear that the program will include trademark protections adequate to balance the needs of global brands and entrepreneurs.  And the howls that the new gTLDs will lead to consumer confusion has died down because, as we knew all along, search is the dominant Internet roadmap.

When the next (and final?) RFP is issued this Fall, it will bring  into even sharper focus for companies and communities the undeniably positive cost/benefit of operating on the ‘net without having to wear a .com disguise.

In the week since the Gandi.net-sponsored report on ICANN’s proposed program to expand the number of gTLDs hit the streets, the debate over the value of the plan has been actively debated.  We noted, in this space last week, that some voices in support of the new extensions has begun to emerge.

Despite the potential for balance, too many voices in the blogosphere continue to dismiss the who exercise as “confusing to consumers.” The biggest problem this argument has in carrying the day is that hardly anyone has asked the market — except, of course, the Gandi.net interviewers and our own pre-order program.  As reported, about 10,000 names a day were pre-ordered in the first month of the program.

ICANN’s meeting in Sydney begins next week with the gTLD program front-and-center (along with, perhaps, the introduction of the organizations new president).  Perhaps when everyone is in the same place at the same time some sanity can be imposed.

As of today, you can pre-order domain names from any new gTLD — those that have been made public or those you think should be created  – right here.

With ICANN giving the world the opportunity to operate vast new areas of the Web to compete with existing registries, like .com, .org and .us, we’re giving you the opportunity to get in early.

Our partner, Pool.com, a leader in domain name acquisition, auction services and secondary market sales, is hosting a dynamic list of gTLDs and is now accepting orders for names within any of them.

The list is “dynamic” because it will expand as communities and corporations announce their plans to apply for a new domain — there are about 50 right now.  And if you see the need for one not yet announced, let us know and we’ll put it on the list.

We think that the enthusiasm for the new web addresses will help prove the business validity of the program.  And by identifying interest in additional extensions we’ll encourage new applicant groups to form.

Placing a pre-order you will get in line now for the best names — names that can best represent you, your business or your special interest. Even better is that there is no fee until the name is secured for your use.

With the wider-ranging media beginning to tell the story of ICANN’s initiative to open up hundreds of new Internet addresses by moving to approve new top level domains (gTLDs), opponants have new fields to plow.  But try as they might, critics of the proposal are far outnumbered by the communities, groups and individuals who see the long-term value in owning a domain, not just renting a name.

The latest example came in USA Today, America’s widely circulated and favorite second read.  The story headlined ‘Turf Wars” and included this message of opposition:

“It costs companies hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, to enforce their trademark rights in the existing space, so imagine how expensive it will be when (a company) gets infringed in a thousand new domains…”  In fact, the behavior of trademark holders and brands is not so clear cut.

For people with vision, it is quite a different picture.  Protections can and are being built in to the process without choking off the potential for real, global, commercial development.  For them, the new gTLD landscape is like a briar patch and they are all Br’er Rabbit just hoping to get thrown in.

ICANN ought to be applauded for creating the opportunity.

Despite the perfectly appropriate criticisms from trademark holders of ICANN’s roll-out of new generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs), there is no denying the potential market power of opening up vast new tracts of Internet real estate.

Even while it may be OK for branded companies to wish they didn’t have to deal with it, the dust that has been kicked up has obscured real value in creating new commercial and community districts on the Web.

The new gTLDs give us the chance to create global marketplaces based on communities of interest. Think about it. For a city promoting tourism, visitors no longer will need to troll thatcityhotel.com or thatcityrestaurant.net or thatcitytransit.ca. It can all be assembled at (dot)thatcity. The metaphor is even more powerful for active, global commercial markets that could rally around domains like .golf or .art or .music (there is already a group working on the last one!).

We are believers in brands and community.