There is a thaw coming to the ice-cold reception that brand and trademark holders gave to ICANN’s plan to introduce a host of new gTLDs.  In recent days, some serious publications have taken a look at the program and found reason to support it.

Forbes pointed out ICANN’s view that the new gTLDs can bring real value to cause-related marketing.  “Cause-related branding is one of the most anticipated consequences of the policy change, ICANN’s spokesman Paul Levins says.”  The most visible example is the group, incuding former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, promoting the gree-focused .eco gTLD.

Even the Financial Times, with its focus on the global business marketplace, is coming to grips with the potential value of the new gTLDs.  In a recent report, the FT noted that “While tensions are high, few dispute that opening up the naming system is a necessary step to creating a more lasting foundation for the internet, and one that will benefit hundreds of millions of users.”

The New York Times has weighed in, too.  The “Newspaper of Record” had a reporter at the ICANN briefing on new gTLDs held recently in New York City.  The result? Theses new gTLD-things might hyave some use afterall the opposition from brand and trademark holers.

“But there is another use for the new top-level domains: simpler Web addresses for companies. Expect to see the likes of .amazon, .ibm and .pepsi. This will let them offer slightly faster ways to get to their various subsections, books.amazon or servers.ibm.”

The ICANN meeting in Sydney gave us both a new head for the Internet’s governing body and a more specific roadmap to the introduction of new gTLDs.  Both are good things, but neither is as meaningful as the subtle but measureable shift in attitude among marketing executives.  Long in lock-step with their lawyers opposed to the new Web landscape, they are now beginning to contemplate the brand value to be found to the right of the dot in a domain name address.

Note this from the Financial Times:

“‘We spend a lot of time and money trying to drive people to websites. Anything that makes it easier to find things on the web is a good thing,’  said Tom Eslinger of Saatchi & Saatchi, the advertising agency.”

It began  with the release of the “Liberalisaton of the Internet” report released last month.  It spread as more companies became even aware of the possibility of owning a branded registry of names and is accelerating as it become clear that the program will include trademark protections adequate to balance the needs of global brands and entrepreneurs.  And the howls that the new gTLDs will lead to consumer confusion has died down because, as we knew all along, search is the dominant Internet roadmap.

When the next (and final?) RFP is issued this Fall, it will bring  into even sharper focus for companies and communities the undeniably positive cost/benefit of operating on the ‘net without having to wear a .com disguise.